The decision came in response to a community vote on aproposal to the foundationfrom contributor Molly White, who goes by the user name GorillaWarfare, argued that accepting donations in cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, bitcoin cash (BCH) and ether (ETH) signals endorsement of digital coins, which are “inherently predatory” as investments and don’t align with the foundation's commitment to environmental sustainability.

Excluding new accounts and unregistered users, of the fewer than 400 users who voted, 232 to 94, or 71.17%, supported no longer accepting crypto.

White argued that Wikipedia risked damaging its reputation by accepting crypto donations, citing the decision earlier in the year by non-profit peer, Mozilla, topause accepting donations in crypto.

Wikimediaaccepts bitcoin, bitcoin cash, and ethervia BitPay. White singled out bitcoin and ether’s need for enormous amounts of energy, while noting that there are other “eco-friendlier” cryptocurrencies, although they are less widely used.

Crypto miners, which use tremendous amounts of computing power to validate transactions usingproof-of-work, have been criticized for damaging the environment.

However, miners have been actively countering such criticism byusing more sustainable energy sourcesfor their mining operations. Furthermore, bitcoin supportersargue that miners can help drive a change to clean energy.

Meanwhile, the Ethereum network has beenworking towards transitioningto aproof-of-stakemodel for validating transactions, which uses less energy, although the switch hasfaced prolonged delays.

Wikimedia left the door open to possibly resuming accepting crypto, saying it will continue to monitor the situation.